Archive for March, 2009

March 29, 2009

Ode to the Zinger Tower

This is a post to show my love and respect for KFC’s Zinger Tower burger. In particular when you add to this already succulent burger the glorious harmony of bacon and cheese. Many a hangover has been cured thanks to this most splendid of burgers.

The Burger of the gods

So to you, Zinger Tower Bacon and Cheese I say thanks!

March 28, 2009

Influence… The hardest chain to break.

Over the last year or so there has been a lot of discussion around influence and the way certain sources of information are given a larger weighting of credibility. These sources are frequently referred to as ‘key influencers’ when discussed in a social media context. However Im going to move out of the social media focus and look at the way influence had a significant impact on a decision I made.

In 2005 a movie was released, the name of this movie was V for Vendetta. At the time it was released the reviews, in Australia at least, were mixed with the negative reviews being particularly passionate. In addition to these reviews I had a few friends in whom I had great faith who said that the film was not worth seeing.

Since this time I have heard many, many positive reviews and yet it has taken me until tonight to watch the film.

Why?
Because the influence of these key people in my life had implanted in my mind so deeply idea of the film being bad that I saw no way to move beyond it. Yet after seeing this film I am left with a feeling of regret. For almost 4 years I have avoided seeing a film due to ideals planted by people I no longer know or care about.

So what does this show?
What this shows is that whether a person wants to admit it or not there are always people in their lives who have enough power and impact to influence them. The other point it brings up is that these influencers need to be authentic in their suggestions. If, for example, the people who told me ‘V for Vendetta’ was a bad film were still in my life their credibility would be completely shot.

I suppose the primary take-away from this is that there are influencers out there for every group and every person and these peoples credibility is their life-blood. Some of these people are more easily accessible than others and the questions brands need to ask themselves when trying to engage with these influencers is “is our product/service in alignment with the influencers beliefs?” Reaching these influencers requires tact and strategy and if it is done well will lead to an impact that goes so much further than standard advertising influence can. It can cast a chain that is much harder to break away from… it took me over 3 years.

March 23, 2009

The problem with all these “Social Media Specialists”

Note: I don’t really like the term “Social media” however I will use it a lot in this post.

There is one major problem with all these so called “social media specialists” that bothers me to no end and is definitely not talked about prominently. The talk to action ratio is seriously out of whack. these experts write post after post, article after article, rulebook after rulebook without actually going out and doing anything other than self promotion. They are all a bunch of pessimistic, cynical, critical big mouths.

Now obviously there are major exceptions to this and I have spoken to lots of people who work within the social media corner of the digital industry that are lovely, thoughtful people. However the broad majority fall into this all talk category. The problem is that people write out these “rules for social media” and “steps for social media strategy” and “professional guide” style posts based on their personal interactions and opinions. However these people more often than not have done sweet F-A with an actual company or brand besides their own. More over these people scathe and criticise anyone who tries to actually utilise social media. Personally, I wouldn’t be actively trying to quash any positive activity in an industry I was trying to make money from. Yes, they are your competitors, but a successful campaign for them means a more open and trusting client for you.

Exhibit A :

Tim Burrows recently posted up this article on Amnesia’s recent campaign for Aussie Home Loans. The article simply stated that the campaign had gone live and the ways in which it was utilising social media in Australia.

Please note the comments it received. Within hours of going up the scathing criticism began. Whether the execution is the great or not is not the point, the point is at least Amnesia and Aussie have actually DONE something. They have committed and have actually created and implemented a campaign that is a social only execution.

For an industry that is predicted to see record growth in 2009, the “experts” certainly seem to be scared and nervous about actually tying anything. This is the problem. People need to suck up that fear and remember that as long as you are honest, open and reasonable when stepping into social media, the only people you will really cop criticism from are these “experts” and at the end of the day its the consumer who we need to please.

So why don’t we all take a breath, calm down and try a bit of positivity. Social Media, as an industry is young, these are early days and EVERYONE is still learning despite their “expert” title. Whether its ideal or not, doing campaigns is the only way we are going to learn and going outside of what we know is safe and the norm is the only way to do something interesting. Consumers are much less vicious than bitter jaded industry folk, so lets start focussing on them instead of our peers.

Once again, I really want to apologise for the words “social media” being beaten into the ground here.

March 18, 2009

The New Inventors Checklist

As we are fast approaching April I thought I would do a quick check on who is going to make it to the filming of The New Inventors on April 3rd, 12:30pm.

I will be meeting people there from 12:15 so as to get in and get decent seats!

Listed below are the people who put their hands up initially, if you are not able to make it let me know so we can invite some other folk along to fill your seats.

Attending:

@damnpenguins
@jayphen
@Glebe2037
@JoelyRighteous
@JessicaBooth
@jyesmith
@pc0
@andrewdever
@SilkCharm
@ryancross
@voirol +2
@jodiem
@ozdj

Many thanks all,

Joel

March 9, 2009

Popping away your value

Recently one of Australia’s largest publishers has had pop-unders running across one of their ‘premium’ sites. This kind of activity not only cheapens the site and makes the publisher appear desperate for cash; it de-values their inventory from a media buyer’s perspective.

Publishers have fought for years to establish themselves as premium sites, selling quality traffic and a smart audience. By having pop-ups, pop-unders or indeed any of the dodgy practises that are common place on sites relating to pornography, piracy and gambling (not that I would ever go onto an unsavoury sight) these publishers place themselves in the same basket with regards to advertising. This desperation to make a buck now will seriously erode the value of the site in the long run and in a climate where people are flight to quality inventory. Never before has there been an online climate that requires such a balance between quality and quantity.

What makes no sense to me is the use of this type of inventory by advertisers. Its not only bad practise and makes you immediately fall into the annoying category usually preserved for pornographers, snake oil salesmen and human traffickers, it is also expensive. These sites are selling these pop-ups as ‘premium’ placements across ‘premium’ sites, however whatever supposed quality the contextual environment supplies the pre-existing negative connotations of these popup windows surely erodes. This effect flows onto those who have not made the mistake of using pop-ups. If, as an advertiser, I have paid a premium to be on a popular news site because I feel protected from clutter and want to be associated with a valued site and safe content I personally would not want ANY type of popup activity happening on the site and, should I decide to go with the site again I most certainly would not be paying the premium again.

In the long run the main damage a publisher does by running this type of placement is to its own integrity. It’s a shame to see an industry that has fought so hard to remove the connotations of spam and pop-ups that were seen as a major deterrent in the dot-com era take this giant leap backwards in the interest of a quick dollar. If publishers continue to make this backslide they will only see the value of their inventory drop dramatically over the coming months as advertisers and media buyers continue to look not only for quality inventory but for lower rates amid a diminishing market.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.