<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This site does not comply with our Global IT Security Policy. If you have a valid business reason for requiring access to this site please contact your IT department.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joelyrighteous.com/2009/06/27/this-site-does-not-comply-with-our-global-it-security-policy-if-you-have-a-valid-business-reason-for-requiring-access-to-this-site-please-contact-your-it-department/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joelyrighteous.com/2009/06/27/this-site-does-not-comply-with-our-global-it-security-policy-if-you-have-a-valid-business-reason-for-requiring-access-to-this-site-please-contact-your-it-department/</link>
	<description>...it's a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2011 06:00:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiphereth</title>
		<link>http://joelyrighteous.com/2009/06/27/this-site-does-not-comply-with-our-global-it-security-policy-if-you-have-a-valid-business-reason-for-requiring-access-to-this-site-please-contact-your-it-department/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tiphereth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 09:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joelyrighteous.com/?p=291#comment-219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last time I had one of those &quot;netnanny&quot; monitor messages was when I was consulting in the comms department for a big 4 bank. They were particularly paranoid - needless to say all webmail was banned, along with a huge number of general sites.

Companies who have policies such as these have low trust of their employees (regardless of IT/internet policies that are part of the employees contract) and tend to behave in a paternalistic way. These companies will be the last to embrace social media marketing, and they are probably the same ones that have banned Facebook/MySpace access in the workplace because they are scared that no-one&#039;s going to be doing any work. 

These types of companies also define &quot;work&quot; very narrowly, the IT Security is an excuse to filter what people are looking at and behave like Big Brother without actually admitting to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last time I had one of those &#8220;netnanny&#8221; monitor messages was when I was consulting in the comms department for a big 4 bank. They were particularly paranoid &#8211; needless to say all webmail was banned, along with a huge number of general sites.</p>
<p>Companies who have policies such as these have low trust of their employees (regardless of IT/internet policies that are part of the employees contract) and tend to behave in a paternalistic way. These companies will be the last to embrace social media marketing, and they are probably the same ones that have banned Facebook/MySpace access in the workplace because they are scared that no-one&#8217;s going to be doing any work. </p>
<p>These types of companies also define &#8220;work&#8221; very narrowly, the IT Security is an excuse to filter what people are looking at and behave like Big Brother without actually admitting to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

